As currently drafted, SB 18 would place New Mexico among the most restrictive states in the nation at a time when affordability, workforce growth, and economic diversification must remain top priorities.
When companies decide where to invest and create jobs, they consistently evaluate four key factors:
- Regulatory cost
- Regulatory certainty
- Infrastructure readiness
- Project timelines
SB 18 raises concerns in all four areas.
Impacts on Employers and Investment
The bill’s scope extends beyond power generation to major employers across multiple sectors, and it counts emissions from out-of-state electricity toward in-state limits. This approach increases costs for New Mexico businesses based on factors they do not control, making the state less competitive for new and expanding investment.
Fiscal Uncertainty and Risk
The Fiscal Impact Report underscores these concerns. Because SB 18 delegates broad authority without clear implementation direction, the report states that revenue impacts cannot be estimated, while warning of potentially significant losses to:
- The general fund
- Permanent funds
- Education funding
- Healthcare services
- Local government revenues
This level of fiscal and regulatory uncertainty discourages investment and job creation—directly undermining economic development efforts statewide.
For these reasons, NM IDEA urges legislators to oppose SB 18 and instead pursue solutions that balance environmental progress with economic opportunity, affordability, and job growth.
Your voice matters.
Share your perspective with policymakers and advocate for a practical, balanced path forward for New Mexico.